山风网络
首页
社会
地球
数学
理化
文学
生命
评论
发明
人物
按页浏览全站文章 站内检索:
  • 王德兴读《吴越品水浒》有感7:张青和孙三娘,是绝对铁杆儿歹徒吗? 2010.09.06(点击:42)

  • 何新:为什么房价难以下跌? 2010.09.05(点击:176)

  • 《趋衡论》挑战现代科学46:小游戏中有大道理 2010.09.05(点击:176)

  • 水 星 和 金 星 为 什 么 没 有 卫 星 2010.09.05(点击:172)

  • 《科技中国》率先首次发布的有关地球翻转的学术消息 2010.09.05(点击:181)

  • 王德兴读《吴越品水浒》有感6:逼上梁山 — 武松杀嫂的必然性 2010.09.04(点击:179)

  • 洛伦兹坐标变换与明义坐标变换 2010.09.04(点击:149)

  • 人生三立 2010.09.03(点击:33)

  • 《趋衡论》挑战现代科学45:核外电子填充游戏 2010.09.03(点击:16)

  • 月 球 起 源 2010.09.03(点击:15)

  • 王德兴读《吴越品水浒》有感5:“马泊六”— 中国婚姻制度的负面文化 2010.09.02(点击:26)

  • 王为民大统一理论 2010.09.01(点击:42)

  • 海底磁异常条带是怎样形成的 2010.09.01(点击:30)

  • 《趋衡论》挑战现代科学44:揭开原子“四个量子数”的神秘面纱 2010.09.01(点击:29)

  • 明义坐标变换式的修改稿 2010.08.31(点击:40)

  • 王德兴读《吴越品水浒》有感4:也谈“潘金莲为什么要勾搭武松?” 2010.08.31(点击:42)

  • 量子色动能保密与开放经济学意义谁大? 2010.08.30(点击:69)

  • 量子色动能保密与开放经济学意义谁大? 2010.08.30(点击:36)

  • 王德兴读《吴越品水浒》有感3:为武松考证,为哪桩? 2010.08.30(点击:34)

  • 明义坐标变换式 2010.08.29(点击:39)

  • 《趋衡论》挑战现代科学43:“质电趋衡”的铁证 2010.08.29(点击:36)

  • 洋底的沉积物为什么稀薄得出奇 2010.08.28(点击:43)

  • 浙大求是班可求是量子色动能?(摘要) 2010.08.28(点击:76)

  • 浙大求是班可求是量子色动能?(摘要) 2010.08.28(点击:41)

  • 我跟爱因斯坦对话(之十二) 2010.08.28(点击:48)

  • 王德兴读《吴越品水浒》有感2:《吴越品水浒》前言 2010.08.28(点击:41)

  • 现代物理学的重大错误 2010.08.27(点击:94)

  • 《趋衡论》挑战现代科学42:化学元素的起源 2010.08.27(点击:47)

  • 山风:如何突破三维空间? 2010.08.27(点击:76)

  • 山风:汉诺塔和九连环开解思路及其启发 2010.08.27(点击:49)

  • 关于我们
    专栏列表

     
    父性教育 迫在眉睫

    教育人的方法虽然五花八门,数不胜数,但归根结底其实只有两种:一种是父性教育,称之为教(jào);一种为母性教育,称为之教(jāo)。 父性教育是强调理想主义的一面,注重于发展,超越,进取,开拓;而母性教育是强调现实主义的一面,注重于稳定、协调、秩序、实际。

    了解详情...

    陈一文顾问专栏
    陈一文 (cheniwan@263.net)
    累计访问篇次:431190
    访问
     


    Socialist Market Economics Studies

    Many Problems are not Caused by “Socialist Market Economy”

    Published by The Social Science Weekly (No.266 Issue, May 17, 2007)

    http://www.sass.org.cn/shkxb/articleshow.jsp?dinji=231&artid=17606&sortid=492)

    Author: Chen I-wan (cheniwan@263.net)
    Website: http://cheniwan.sea3000.net

    Advisor, Committee of Natural Hazard Prediction for China Geophysics Society, and Advisor, Committee of Disaster Historical Studies for China Disaster Prevention Association

    Author note: The Social Science Weekly (No.266 Issue, May 17, 2007), under the auspices of the Shanghai Academy of Social Science, published a paper Many Problems are not Caused by Socialist Market Economy”. This paper provided a brief introduction of “Must Theoretically Clarify the Fundamental Differences Between Socialist Market Economy and Free Capitalism Market Economy!”, an important paper by Advisor Chen I-wan. The author emphasizes that this paper was not a paper giving special studies to the issue of socialist market economics. As preliminary result conducting trans-disciplinary integrative and comprehensive study on the complex issue of “Energy & Environment”, in early Feb. 2006 the author completed a comprehensive series of paper “CHINA MUST PROCEED ALONG A NEW ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT ROAD NEVER PROCEEDED BY ANY NATION IN THE WORLD! – My Science Development View of the “Energy & Environment” Issue” formed by a series of 60 papers on the subject (http://cheniwan.sea3000.net/e/energy-environment/60.php) “Must Theoretically Clarify the Fundamental Differences Between Socialist Market Economy and Free Capitalism Market Economy!” is the 56th paper of the above series of papers. The author edited this paper and four other papers related to the issue of socialist market economics from the above series into a collection: Exploratory Studies of Socialist Market Economics, which is posted at Advisor Chen I-wan Website under column Socialist Market Economics Studies: http://cheniwan.sea3000.net/e/marketeconomy/

    ☞ Exploratory Studies of Socialist Market Economics

    The Authors Comment: The issues raised by this paper within quite a period of time might be opposed by many theorists and economists. However, more and more facts provide the author with enough confidence that these issues will gradually win acknowledgment, recognition and agreement by more and more theorists and economics who truly want to establish a “Harmonious Society” in China, and have sense of strong social responsibility to the Chinese people and global mankind. It is for this reason that the author especially recommends these papers to all of you. By presenting what I have learnt from a very special approach and angle of view, very different to most professional researchers, is to stimulate further thoughts on these issues and invite comments, oppugns and criticism from researchers paying attention to these issues, which could become a starting point for my further more in-depth study to these issues.

    The author words

    (1) The Western economic style of transportation energy development road is “not possible in China”!

    (2) China must organize an as detail as possible medical investigation survey, social investigation and science research to predict the total volume of vehicle population each city could bear respectively, and the harmful consequences caused by different exceeding levels of the vehicle population respective to each city!

    (3) The fundamental reason for China’s all around environment pollution continuing to deteriorate and still not effectively reversed and kept within limits?

    (4) Must theoretically make clear the fundamental difference between socialist market economy and free capitalism market economy!

    (5) “Green taxation” is an important integrated part of socialist market economy!

    Author: Pinch Guantao (Taste Tea and Observe The Tide): Deng Xiao-ping ten points of warning to China:

    The 1st Warning: The distribution of the incomes of all people should benefit all people – We are a socialist country, the distribution of the incomes of all people should benefit all people, making no people too rich, and no people too poor, therefore life becomes good in large for all. (Strive for Unity of the Whole Chinese Nation, 1986 p161-162)

    The 2nd Warning: If carry out polarization (of rich and poor), China will have a problem of a revolution occurring again – Become rich together, from the very beginning of reform started to talk about this, in the future one day it will become the central issue. Socialist is not a few people becoming rich and most people poor; it should not be like that. The greatest advantage of socialist is becoming rich together, this is one respect indicating the socialist essence. If carry out polarization (of rich and poor), the situation will be different, minority conflicts, regional conflicts, class conflicts will all develop, conflicts between the central government and local governments will also develop, then chaos might occur. ……

    Li Ji-ping: How much price must the normal people pay more for reform

    Mistiness of the theory is an important factor. As example, the “(crossing the river by) feeling the stones” theory during a rather long period of time influences the process of reform. This theory, visualizing, specific, during the early stages of the reform and open door policy received acceptance and support from most people. However, as the reform and open door proceeds, people more and more found, the reform process does not conform to logic. Because, according to normal logic, those groups who lead the way to “feel the stones” in the “river”, should be those encountering the greatest risks, and after “feeling” the exit routes, those who “cross through the river” should be the most safest people with comparative least risks. But the facts are not so. Those groups who “felt the stones” and crossed the river, not only did not encounter any risks, on the contrary become the estates that enjoyed most benefits. Do not mention the decision making ranks, even those enterprise management teams who for some time suffered hardship together with the unemployed employees, also become those who “swallowed benefits” from the “(crossing the river by) feeling stones” theory.

    Bao Yu-jun, Deputy Chairman, All China Industry & Commerce Association revealed through the “Economic Observer Newspaper” (Jan. 1, 2007): Until the end of 2006, the total number of private enterprises accounted to 4.86 million, in which over 20% were converted from State owned enterprises and Collective Enterprises. These over 1 million enterprises, behind the glory of their conversion, the price paid by nobody knows how many employees losing their jobs or becoming unemployed, becomes something that it likely that very few people will think about; and those groups who followed and “crossed the river”, who should be those most safety, instead have to undertake the risk of enterprise conversion and unemployment.

    您可能感兴趣的文章:

    1. 共旋引力波理论初探(第五章 “共旋引力波”在太阳系演化中的作用 前言) (点击:469|投票:0)

    2. 共旋引力波理论初探(第五章 “共旋引力波”在太阳系演化中的作用1) (点击:452|投票:0)

    3. 共旋引力波理论初探(第五章 “共旋引力波”在太阳系演化中的作用2) (点击:403|投票:0)

    4. 共旋引力波理论初探(第五章 “共旋引力波”在太阳系演化中的作用3) (点击:420|投票:0)

    5. 共旋引力波理论初探(第五章 “共旋引力波”在太阳系演化中的作用4) (点击:466|投票:0)

    6. 共旋引力波理论初探(第六章 引力波与月球运动理论 前言) (点击:422|投票:0)

    7. 共旋引力波理论初探(第六章 引力波与月球运动理论1) (点击:433|投票:0)

    8. 共旋引力波理论初探(第六章 引力波与月球运动理论2) (点击:467|投票:0)

    9. 共旋引力波理论初探(第六章 引力波与月球运动理论3) (点击:452|投票:0)

    对部分“非主流科技研究”经验采取紧急“抢救”措施。

    评论
    姓名:
    电邮:
    正文: