|
Advisor Chen I-wan：Eighteen evaluation parameters for comprehensive analysis scientific evaluation of conventional forms of energy as well as new alternative forms of energy.
(Published by the Collection of Papers for the 3rd 2006 Shanghai Evnironment Protection & Revewable Energy International Forum, Oct. 30 – 31, 2006)
Massive scale economic activities of mankind, and problems of energy shortage, and atmosphere pollution, global greenhouse effect and global warming, water pollution and water shortage have long ago interweaved together, forming an interrelated open, complex and massive system. Therefore, to study the effect of energy structure adjustment to this interrelated open, complex and massive system must conduct comprehensive analysis, not only comprehensive analysis to the overall system, but also comprehensive analysis to the overall energy structure, and comprehensive analysis to both the positive and negative effects of various adjustments to the different aspects of the open, complex and massive system, as well as the overall effect of the different effects weaved together to the open, complex and massive system. The eighteen evaluation parameters for comprehensive analysis and scientific evaluation to all types of conventional energies and all types of new alternative energies are accordingly proposed.
Introduction
Evaluation parameter No.1: No discharge of carbon dioxide emission or dramatic reduction of discharge of carbon dioxide emission compared with conventional fuels!
Evaluation parameter No.2: When it burns, no consumption of atmospheric oxygen, or dramatic reduction of consumption of atmospheric oxygen compared with conventional fuels!
Evaluation parameter No.3: Does not cause potential evil consequence with substantial damaging risk at present or in the future to mankind or environment!
Evaluation parameter No.4: Through stringent and fair scientific tests prove to cause less pollution, and not cause greater pollution!
Evaluation parameter No.5: The whole "production --> transportation -->storage --> application" process must be economic, safe, energy conservation, green and friendly to the environment!
Evaluation parameter No.6: Demonstrates cost competitiveness advantage against conventional fossil fuels when the international market price of crude oil was about USD30/barrel!
Evaluation parameter No.7: Has the economic technical feasibility potential to replace over 50% portion of traditional fossil fuels within twelve (12) to fifteen (15) years, i.e. by 2017 - 2020!
Evaluation parameter No.8: Has the economic technical feasibility potential to replace a considerable portion of automotive fuels, i.e. gasoline, diesel oil, natural gas, etc., within seven to eight years, i.e. by 2012 - 2013!
Evaluation parameter No.9: Has the economic technical feasibility potential to replace a considerable portion of residential kitchen fuels within seven (7) to eight (8) years, i.e. by 2012 - 2013!
Evaluation parameter No.10: Has the economic technical feasibility potential to replace a considerable portion of all applications of fossil fuels within seven (7) to eight (8) years, i.e. by 2012 - 2013!
Evaluation parameter No.11: Has the economic technical feasibility potential to assist in achieving "clean burning" of coal!
Evaluation parameter No.12: Economic feasibility of wide scale application for most nations and regions, or wide scale application can be achieved only by paying the price of massive investment difficult for most countries and areas to bear?
Evaluation parameter No.13: Is it a natural resource acceptable solution for wide scale application, or wide scale application can be achieved only by paying the price of consuming excessive natural resources required by mankind for its present or future survival?
Evaluation parameter No.14: Is it possible to use city waste sewage as the input raw material for producing the new type of alternative energy?
Evaluation parameter No.15: Is it possible to use countryside animal husbandry farm and residential waste sewage as the input raw material for producing the new type of alternative energy?
Evaluation parameter No.16: Is it suitable for both centralized large-scale production, as well as for decentralized small-scale production?
Evaluation parameter No.17: Can it directly use existing equipment used by present fuels, or only requires simple renovation to such equipment?
Evaluation parameter No.18: Can it produce much more new type of energy products from consuming conventional natural resources compared with conventional technology?
Final words
Welcome questions and discussions on the issues presented by the author. Address: Xin Shi Ji Commercial Center Rm.316, No.A2 Bai Jia Zhuang Lu, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100020, China. Email: cheniwan@263.net
☞ back to index ☞ back to homepage ☞ back to last page
|