He Zuo-xu, Fang Zhou-zi Criticism

☞ Advisor Chen I-wan: Must not shy away from the most serious misjudged “pseudoscience” case of modern China

Author’s Remarks: This is the author’s email dated Feb. 23, 2007 responding to a friend. Subject: Must not shy away from the most serious misjudged “pseudoscience” case of modern China. The email states: There are three most greatest master level scientists of modern China: Li Si-guang, Weng Wen-bo and Qian Xue-sen. Qian is the most greatest master level scientists of today’s China! Si Ma-nan openly slanders “To the widespread of pseudoscience in China, Qian Xue-sen holds main responsibility”. This is the most serious misjudged “pseudoscience” case of modern China. If we shy away from this most serious misjudged “pseudoscience” case of modern China, we will not be able to face Qian Xue-sen or face the Chinese people of today, and especially would not be able to face our future offsprings! This also indicates that our debate with He Zuo-xiu, Si Ma-nan, Fang Zhou-zi and their jingbang needs to proceed to a deeper level.

☞ Advisor Chen I-wan ：Does the “Sansi”website have the courage to establish a forum on your website for me to hold a debate with Fang Zhou-zi and his supporters? -- Chen I-wan’s public letter to the the “Sansi” website

I especially noticed your comment “these signees unnecessarily all engage in pseudoscience, but from the proportion of the number of such person, this undoubt is a mass of pseudoscience personnel”, and accordingly ask if you have the courage to establish a forum under your control to hold a public debate around the issues of fighting against “pseudoscience, enabling me to debate with Fang Zhou-zi and his supporters you obviously give strong support? The only condition is you mast post disprove papers submitted by me!

☞ Advisor Chen I-wan ：Materials for thought animadvert on wrong words and deeds by He Zuo-xiu and Fang Zhou-zi suppressing and strangling scientific and technical innovations.

Mainstream scholars of the scientific community still cannot achieve satisfactory, self-justifying explanations on these most basic important problems mankind requires them to study. This only indicates that the basic theories of modern Earth science, geophysics, seismology and meteorology insisted to be valid by the academic authorities probably contain a series of mistakes leading scientists in the wrong research directions. Facing Nature’s exam on these most basic questions, they still have not passed even the basic school grade! China’s outstanding geologist, Li Si-guang, is a typical exceptional. He studied the crust structural movement with a view of mechanics, and found some relationships between the Earth’s rotational movement and crust structural movements. It could be foreseen, if Li Si-guang would have lived on for another ten years, proceeding further along this direction, Li Si-guang and his collaborators would have been able to accomplish even more significant discoveries.

☞ Wang Zhong-yu: A Cool Look at the debate around “Pseudoscience”

Advisor Chen I-wan strongly recommends this paper by Mr. Wang Zhong-yu published on the “Science Times”, and recommends us to post the full text. Address of original paper:http://tech.sina.com.cn/d/2007-01-12/20371333648.shtml

☞ TOM Website:Four Scientisits Propose to eliminate “Pseudoscience” (from the Popular Science Law)

Chen I-wan: Dear internet fans of the Tom Website, my name is Chen I-wan, I am a British Chinese, in 1950 when I was 8 years old my father brought me to China, thus I have been living in China for 56 years. Since 2002 I have been invited as the advisor to the Committee of Natural Disaster Prediction to the China Geophysics Society, and since 2004 the advisor to the Committee of Disaster Historical Studies to the China Disaster Prevention Association.